Run more client validationswith the team you have.

A CRO validates the same systems again and again for different sponsors: EDC, CTMS, eTMF, safety databases. Merivane runs the chain per sponsor and per system and produces a sponsor-ready package each time.

The whole chain, per sponsor, per system.
  1. Approved requirement
  2. Test scripts
  3. Autonomous execution
  4. You take over
  5. Defects logged
  6. Signed OQ / PQ report
Bottleneck

Your limit is execution hours, not expertise.

The same protocol runs again for the next sponsor. What changes is who watches, who signs, and which workspace the evidence sits in.

  • Same protocol, different sponsorThe script library carries over. Only the configuration changes.
  • Every sponsor sends an auditorEach one needs its own read-only seat on the run.
  • Fixed-fee validations need predictable hoursExecution time is the variable you can plan for.
Effort per validation14-requirement OQ · 96 steps
By handScripts, clicks, screenshots, matrix, report
Months
With MerivaneReview, take over, sign
Days

Based on one system, one sponsor. Your numbers will vary.

Separation

One workspace per sponsor. Nothing crosses over.

Each sponsor gets its own workspace, its own runs, and its own auditor seat. Evidence does not move between them.

  • Separate workspace per sponsorNo shared runs or evidence across sponsors.
  • Sponsor read-only auditor seatEach sponsor can watch its own run.
  • Full export at study closeThe sponsor takes the complete package with them.
Workspaces3 sponsors
Sponsor A · EDC-UAT3 runs · 2 auditors
Sponsor B · CTMS1 run
Sponsor C · eTMFScripts in review
Reuse

The next sponsor starts from approved scripts, not from zero.

A library of approved scripts carries forward by system version. Each sponsor gets a fresh run with its own evidence.

  • Library of approved scriptsKept per system version, ready for the next sponsor.
  • Sponsor differences shown as a diffOnly the configuration steps that differ are highlighted.
  • Evidence is never reusedEach sponsor gets a fresh run and fresh evidence.
Script librarySystem: EDC v12
EDC v1242 approved scripts · used for 4 sponsors
Sponsor-specific steps
Study ID field mapped to Sponsor A configuration
Second approver added to batch record step
Deliverable

A package the sponsor's QA accepts.

The OQ or PQ report, the RTM, the defect log, and evidence with hashes, all signed and named for the study.

  • Signed report, RTM, defect log, evidenceOne package, all cross-referenced.
  • Sponsor name and study ID on every pageEach page shows which sponsor and study it belongs to.
  • Sponsor auditor can verify the chainThe auditor traces the report back to the evidence themselves.
Report coverPage 1
Operational Qualification reportOQ-3107EDC v12 · Sponsor A · Study ABC-301
Systems CROs validate

Any browser-based GxP system you can give a test account to.

EDCCTMSeTMFIRT / RTSMeCOA / ePROSafety databaseBioanalytical LIMS

Questions about validating for CROs.

If your question is not here, ask us. We reply within one working day.

Can the sponsor watch the run?

Yes, with a read-only seat.

Who owns the evidence?

The sponsor, in their workspace. You export it at study close.

Do sponsor auditors accept AI-executed steps?

Every step is attributed and evidenced. A person reviews and signs. CSA guidance supports this model.

Can we run several sponsors in parallel?

Yes.

Now onboarding validation pilot partners

See a full run on one of your systems.

Bring one approved requirement. We show you the chain end to end, on a system you already use, in under an hour.

Book a demo
Reply timeOne working day
FormatLive run, 45 minutes